Author: National Science Foundation (U.S.)Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 14
Book Description
Publications of the National Science Foundation
Author: National Science Foundation (U.S.)Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 14
Book Description
Social Science for What?
Author: Mark SoloveyPublisher: MIT Press
ISBN: 0262358751
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 409
Book Description
How the NSF became an important yet controversial patron for the social sciences, influencing debates over their scientific status and social relevance. In the early Cold War years, the U.S. government established the National Science Foundation (NSF), a civilian agency that soon became widely known for its dedication to supporting first-rate science. The agency's 1950 enabling legislation made no mention of the social sciences, although it included a vague reference to "other sciences." Nevertheless, as Mark Solovey shows in this book, the NSF also soon became a major--albeit controversial--source of public funding for them.
Publications of the National Science Foundation
Author: Science and Technology Pocket Data Book
Author: A Patron for Pure Science
Author: James Merton EnglandPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 478
Book Description
Science & Engineering Indicators
Author: National Science Foundation Programs for Dissemination of Scientific Information
Author: National Science Foundation (U.S.)Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 24
Book Description
Grant Proposal Guide
Author: National Science Foundation (U.S.)Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 92
Book Description
SBIR at the National Science Foundation
Author: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and MedicinePublisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309311993
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 367
Book Description
The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program is one of the largest examples of U.S. public-private partnerships, and was established in 1982 to encourage small businesses to develop new processes and products and to provide quality research in support of the U.S. government's many missions. The U.S. Congress tasked the National Research Council with undertaking a comprehensive study of how the SBIR program has stimulated technological innovation and used small businesses to meet federal research and development needs, and with recommending further improvements to the program. In the first round of this study, an ad hoc committee prepared a series of reports from 2004 to 2009 on the SBIR program at the five agencies responsible for 96 percent of the program's operations-including the National Science Foundation (NSF). Building on the outcomes from the first round, this second round presents the committee's second review of the NSF SBIR program's operations. Public-private partnerships like SBIR are particularly important since today's knowledge economy is driven in large part by the nation's capacity to innovate. One of the defining features of the U.S. economy is a high level of entrepreneurial activity. Entrepreneurs in the United States see opportunities and are willing and able to assume risk to bring new welfare-enhancing, wealth-generating technologies to the market. Yet, although discoveries in areas such as genomics, bioinformatics, and nanotechnology present new opportunities, converting these discoveries into innovations for the market involves substantial challenges. The American capacity for innovation can be strengthened by addressing the challenges faced by entrepreneurs.
Reproducibility and Replicability in Science
Author: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and MedicinePublisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309486165
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 257
Book Description
One of the pathways by which the scientific community confirms the validity of a new scientific discovery is by repeating the research that produced it. When a scientific effort fails to independently confirm the computations or results of a previous study, some fear that it may be a symptom of a lack of rigor in science, while others argue that such an observed inconsistency can be an important precursor to new discovery. Concerns about reproducibility and replicability have been expressed in both scientific and popular media. As these concerns came to light, Congress requested that the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine conduct a study to assess the extent of issues related to reproducibility and replicability and to offer recommendations for improving rigor and transparency in scientific research. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science defines reproducibility and replicability and examines the factors that may lead to non-reproducibility and non-replicability in research. Unlike the typical expectation of reproducibility between two computations, expectations about replicability are more nuanced, and in some cases a lack of replicability can aid the process of scientific discovery. This report provides recommendations to researchers, academic institutions, journals, and funders on steps they can take to improve reproducibility and replicability in science.