Author: John ConybearePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bible
Languages : en
Pages : 32
Book Description
The Nature, Possibility and Certainty of Miracles Set Forth; and the Truth of the Christian Religion Proved from Thence
Author: John ConybeareThe Nature, Possibility and Certainty of Miracles Set Forth;
Author: John ConybeareThe Nature, Possibility and Certainty of Miracles Set Forth
Author: John ConybeareThe Nature, Possibility and Certainty of Miracles Set Forth; and the Truth of the Christian Religion Prov'd from Thence. A Sermon Preach'd Before the University of Oxford, at St. Mary's, on Sunday, Decemb. 24th 1721. By John Conybeare .. The Third Edition
Author: John Conybeare (Bishop of Bristol.)Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 36
Book Description
The Nature, Possibility and Certainty of Miracles Set Forth
Author: John ConybeareThe National Union Catalog, Pre-1956 Imprints
Author: Library of CongressPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Catalogs, Union
Languages : en
Pages : 768
Book Description
The Nature, Possibility and Certainty of Miracles Set Forth
Author: John ConybeareIn Defense of Miracles
Author: R. Douglas GeivettPublisher: InterVarsity Press
ISBN: 0830897747
Category : Religion
Languages : en
Pages : 332
Book Description
Can modern intellectuals believe in miracles? Editors R. Douglas Geivett and Gary R. Habermas provide a collection of essays to refute objections to the miraculous and set forth the positive case for God's action in history.
Oxford and Cambridge undergraduate's journal
Author: Moral Uncertainty
Author: William MacAskillPublisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0191033642
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 224
Book Description
This is an open access title available under the terms of a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licence. It is free to read at Oxford Scholarship Online and offered as a free PDF download from OUP and selected open access locations. Very often we're uncertain about what we ought, morally, to do. We don't know how to weigh the interests of animals against humans, how strong our duties are to improve the lives of distant strangers, or how to think about the ethics of bringing new people into existence. But we still need to act. So how should we make decisions in the face of such uncertainty? Though economists and philosophers have extensively studied the issue of decision-making in the face of uncertainty about matters of fact, the question of decision-making given fundamental moral uncertainty has been neglected. Philosophers William MacAskill, Krister Bykvist, and Toby Ord try to fill this gap. Moral Uncertainty argues that there are distinctive norms that govern how one ought to make decisions. It defends an information-sensitive account of how to make such decisions by developing an analogy between moral uncertainty and social choice, arguing that the correct way to act in the face of moral uncertainty depends on whether the moral theories in which one has credence are merely ordinal, cardinal, or both cardinal and intertheoretically comparable. It tackles the problem of how to make intertheoretical comparisons, discussing potential solutions and the implications of their view for metaethics and practical ethics.