Author: United States. Department of the Air Force
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Air bases
Languages : en
Pages : 108
Book Description
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: Summary
Author: United States. Department of the Air Force
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Air bases
Languages : en
Pages : 108
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Air bases
Languages : en
Pages : 108
Book Description
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: Responses to comments
Author: United States. Department of the Air Force
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Air bases
Languages : en
Pages : 312
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Air bases
Languages : en
Pages : 312
Book Description
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: Chapters 1 through 9
Author: United States. Department of the Air Force
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Air bases
Languages : en
Pages : 946
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Air bases
Languages : en
Pages : 946
Book Description
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Amendment of the Land and Resource Management Plan, San Juan National Forest
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Offshore oil industry
Languages : en
Pages : 202
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Offshore oil industry
Languages : en
Pages : 202
Book Description
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact analysis
Languages : en
Pages : 282
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact analysis
Languages : en
Pages : 282
Book Description
Draft Yosemite Valley Plan : Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: Executive summary
Author: United States. National Park Service
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact analysis
Languages : en
Pages : 198
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact analysis
Languages : en
Pages : 198
Book Description
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Prototype Oil Shale Leasing Program
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Keystone XL Project
Author: Genevieve Walker
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781457853234
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 44
Book Description
The Keystone XL Pipeline (the proposed Project) is a proposed 875-mile pipeline project that would allow delivery of up to 830,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil from the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) in Canada and the Bakken Shale Formation in the U.S. to Steele City, Nebraska, for onward delivery to refineries in the Gulf Coast area. TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP has applied for a Presidential Permit that, if granted, would authorize the proposed pipeline to cross the U.S.-Canadian border at Morgan, Montana. The U.S. Dept. of State prepared this Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to assess the potential impacts associated with the proposed Project and its alternatives. This Statement makes few changes to the conclusion reached in a previously issued report, that rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline would not hinder development of oil sands in Canada (which are emissions-intensive). However, it makes no statement about the impact of greenhouse gas emissions from the proposed Project. Tables and figures. This is a print on demand report.
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781457853234
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 44
Book Description
The Keystone XL Pipeline (the proposed Project) is a proposed 875-mile pipeline project that would allow delivery of up to 830,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil from the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) in Canada and the Bakken Shale Formation in the U.S. to Steele City, Nebraska, for onward delivery to refineries in the Gulf Coast area. TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP has applied for a Presidential Permit that, if granted, would authorize the proposed pipeline to cross the U.S.-Canadian border at Morgan, Montana. The U.S. Dept. of State prepared this Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to assess the potential impacts associated with the proposed Project and its alternatives. This Statement makes few changes to the conclusion reached in a previously issued report, that rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline would not hinder development of oil sands in Canada (which are emissions-intensive). However, it makes no statement about the impact of greenhouse gas emissions from the proposed Project. Tables and figures. This is a print on demand report.