The Pocket Veto Power PDF Download

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Economic and Commercial Law
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Pocket veto
Languages : en
Pages : 130

View

Book Description

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee No. 5
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 152

View

Book Description

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Monopolies and Commercial Law
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Pocket veto
Languages : en
Pages : 44

View

Book Description

Author: Jonathan Lurie
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
ISBN: 0700633391
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 186

View

Book Description
According to the US Constitution, if a bill is not returned to Congress by the president within ten days of receiving it and Congress has adjourned, the bill is effectively vetoed. The so-called pocket veto dates at least as far back as the presidency of James Madison (1808–1816), but the constitutionality of its use had not been considered by the Supreme Court until Okanogan Tribe et al. v. United States was decided in 1929, during the last year of Chief Justice Taft’s tenure. Despite responding to a situation in American Indian law, the Pocket Veto Case is notable for the fact that its final decision had nothing whatsoever to do with Indian law. The Okanogan Tribe is barely mentioned at all in the Court’s unanimous opinion, delivered by Justice Edward Sanford, which ultimately concluded that the pocket veto is a constitutional exercise of presidential authority. The Unusual Story of the Pocket Veto Case explores the underlying tension between congressional authority and the executive prerogative. Especially today, with such tension very much in evidence, it becomes all the more important to understand how and why the Constitution actually appears to encourage it. Studying Okanogan Tribe et al. v. United States and use of the pocket veto provides an excellent example of the tension between Congress and the president.

Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Separation of Powers
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Pocket veto
Languages : en
Pages : 252

View

Book Description

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 152

View

Book Description

Author: United States. Congress. House. Judiciary Committee
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 146

View

Book Description

Author: Edward Campbell Mason
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 248

View

Book Description

Author: Robert J. Spitzer
Publisher: State University of New York Press
ISBN: 143842082X
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 206

View

Book Description
This is the first modern study of the veto. In addition to tracing the genesis and historical evolution from Ancient Rome, through the ultimate inclusion in the Constitution, it also explores the veto's consequences for modern presidents. In doing so, Spitzer promotes a key argument about the relation between the veto power and the Presidency — namely, that the rise of the veto power, beginning with the first Chief Executive, is symptomatic of the rise of the strong modern Presidency, and has in fact been a major tool of Presidency-building. A special and revealing irony of the veto power is seen in the finding that, despite its monarchical roots and anti-majoritarian nature, the veto has become a key vehicle for presidents to appeal directly to, and on behalf of, the people. Thus, the veto's utility for presidents arises not only as a power to use against Congress, but also as a symbolic, plebiscitary tool.

Author: Robert J. Spitzer
Publisher: SUNY Press
ISBN: 9780887068034
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 212

View

Book Description
This is the first modern study of the veto. In addition to tracing the genesis and historical evolution from Ancient Rome, through the ultimate inclusion in the Constitution, it also explores the veto’s consequences for modern presidents. In doing so, Spitzer promotes a key argument about the relation between the veto power and the Presidency — namely, that the rise of the veto power, beginning with the first Chief Executive, is symptomatic of the rise of the strong modern Presidency, and has in fact been a major tool of Presidency-building. A special and revealing irony of the veto power is seen in the finding that, despite its monarchical roots and anti-majoritarian nature, the veto has become a key vehicle for presidents to appeal directly to, and on behalf of, the people. Thus, the veto’s utility for presidents arises not only as a power to use against Congress, but also as a symbolic, plebiscitary tool.