Military and Veterans Disability System: Preliminary Observations on Evaluation and Planned Expansion DOD/VA Pilot: Testimony Before the Committee on Veterans Affairs, U.S. Senate PDF Download

Author:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1437943462
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 19

View

Book Description

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 20

View

Book Description
In their evaluation of the IDES pilot, DOD and VA concluded that, as of February 2010, the pilot had (1) improved servicemember satisfaction relative to the existing "legacy" system and (2) met their established goal of delivering VA benefits to active duty and reserve component servicemembers within 295 and 305 days, respectively, on average. While these results are promising, average case processing times have since steadily increased - for example, for active duty servicemembers, the average has increased from 274 days in February 2010 to 296 days in August 2010. At 296 days, processing time for the IDES is still an improvement over the 540 days that DOD and VA estimated the legacy process takes to deliver VA benefits to servicemembers. However, the full extent of improvement of the IDES over the legacy system is unknown because (1) the 540-day estimate was based on a small, nonrepresentative sample of cases and (2) limitations in legacy case data prevent a comprehensive comparison of processing times, as well as appeal rates.

Author: John H. Pendleton
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1437909833
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 28

View

Book Description
In Feb. 2007, a series of Wash. Post articles disclosed deficiencies in the provision of outpatient services at Walter Reed Army Med. Center, raising concerns about the care for returning servicemembers. These deficiencies included a confusing disability evaluation system and servicemembers in outpatient status for years without a clear understanding about their plan of care. In response, the Army took a number of actions and DoD formed a joint DoD-VA Senior Oversight Comm. This statement provides info. on the near-term actions being taken by the Army and the broader efforts of the Senior Oversight Comm. to address longer-term systemic problems that impact health care and disability evaluations for returning servicemembers. Illustrations.

Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Veterans' Affairs
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Health & Fitness
Languages : en
Pages : 64

View

Book Description

Author: Daniel Bertoni
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1437910610
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 54

View

Book Description
In Feb. 2007, a series of articles in ¿The Washington Post¿ about conditions at Walter Reed Army Medical Center highlighted problems in the military¿s disability evaluation system (DES). Subsequently, the Dept. of the Army, the DoD, and the VA undertook initiatives to address concerns with the DES. In 2007, the Army took steps to streamline its process, and DoD and VA began piloting a joint evaluation system to address systemic concerns abut timeliness and the potential inefficiency of having separate DES. This report examines: (1) recent actions by the Army to help servicemembers navigate its DES; and (2) the status, plans, and challenges of DoD and VA¿s efforts to pilot and implement a joint DES Includes recommendations. Illustrations.

Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Veterans' Affairs
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 396

View

Book Description

Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Disability evaluation
Languages : en
Pages : 204

View

Book Description

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0

View

Book Description
Why GAO Did This Study. In February 2007, a series of Washington Post articles about conditions at Walter Reed Army Medical Center highlighted problems in the Army's case management of injured servicemembers and in the military's disability evaluation system. These deficiencies included a confusing disability evaluation process and servicemembers in outpatient status for months and sometimes years without a clear understanding about their plan of care. These reported problems prompted various reviews and commissions to examine the care and services to servicemembers. In response to problems at Walter Reed and subsequent recommendations, the Army took a number of actions and DOD formed a joint DOD-VA Senior Oversight Committee. This statement updates GAO's September 2007 testimony and is based on ongoing work to (1) assess actions taken by the Army to help ill and injured soldiers obtain health care and navigate its disability evaluation process; and to (2) describe the status, plans, and challenges of DOD and VA efforts to implement a joint disability evaluation system. GAO's observations are based largely on documents obtained from and interviews with Army, DOD, and VA officials. The facts contained in this statement were discussed with representatives from the Army, DOD, and VA.

Author: John H. Pendleton
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Disability evaluation
Languages : en
Pages : 28

View

Book Description

Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Special Investigation Unit on Gulf War Illnesses
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Persian Gulf War, 1991
Languages : en
Pages : 704

View

Book Description