Quality Improvement in the United States PDF Download

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Industries
Languages : en
Pages : 364

View

Book Description

Author: United States. Internal Revenue Service. Service Center Quality Improvement Study Team
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Database management
Languages : en
Pages : 76

View

Book Description

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Commerce. Subcommittee on Health and the Environment
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 64

View

Book Description

Author: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services
Publisher: Createspace Independent Pub
ISBN: 9781490382135
Category : Medical
Languages : en
Pages : 86

View

Book Description
In early 2003, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) released its report, Priority Areas for National Action: Transforming Health Care Quality. The report listed 20 clinical topics for which best practice treatment guidelines are strongly supported by clinical evidence. Unfortunately, the report and a substantial quantity of other scientific literature show best practice implementation rates in the United States have been disappointing low, and at an annual cost of many thousands of lives. To bring data to bear on the quality improvement opportunities laid out in the IOM's 2003 report, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) asked the Stanford–UCSF Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) to perform a critical analysis of the existing literature on quality improvement strategies for a number of the 20 disease and treatment priorities noted in the IOM Report. Rather than concentrating on the specific clinical practices that appear to improve health outcomes, these analyses focus on the effort of translating research into practice–identifying those activities that increase the rate at which effective practices are applied to patient care in real world settings. The goal is one of narrowing the quality gap that is largely responsible for suboptimal health care practices and outcomes. This is the first volume in a series of reports intended to support these goals. A carefully designed methodology will be applied to the scientific literature for a number of medical conditions characterized by the IOM as high-level threats to health and longevity. It is AHRQ's hope that the series will stimulate ideas for ongoing quality improvement activity nationally, as well as in individual health systems and among individual caregivers. Closing the Quality Gap is intended to assist a wide range of users: Policymakers can use the detailed evidence review to prioritize quality improvement strategies and choose how best to close the quality gaps in their organizations; Researchers can find detailed information about well-scrutinized areas of treatment, while learning of other areas in need of further exploration; Clinicians and trainees can see a broad spectrum of approaches to improving the quality of care. Some of these approaches fall within the control of individual practitioners, while others will require major systemic changes at the local level or beyond; Patients can learn quality improvement strategies that they can help to promote, while gaining a deeper understanding of the nature and extent of quality gaps, as well as the systemic changes necessary to close them; Groups and individuals charged with funding research will be able to identify high-yield areas of concern that warrant future research support. The purpose of this report is to help readers assess whether the evidence suggests that a quality improvement strategy would work in their specific practice setting or with their specific patient population. Three important questions should be considered: 1. Are the studies of the strategy valid? A study has validity (sometimes called “internal validity”) if its findings are likely to be true in the population in which the study was performed. The primary determinant of validity is the design and conduct of the study. 2. For each quality improvement strategy that has been evaluated in multiple studies with sufficient validity, does the weight of evidence indicate that the strategy is effective? 3. Can the conclusions of a body of evidence be applied to a specific practice setting or population of interest?

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Total quality management
Languages : en
Pages : 36

View

Book Description

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Subcommittee on Technology and Competitiveness
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award
Languages : en
Pages : 356

View

Book Description

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic government information
Languages : en
Pages : 36

View

Book Description

Author: The National Roundtable on Health Care Quality
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309592917
Category : Medical
Languages : en
Pages : 49

View

Book Description
In November, 1997, The Institute of Medicine convened a one-day conference to explore areas for potential collaboration to improve quality among competing health plans consistent with antitrust and other legal requirements. The conference was convened to clarify the limits of such potential activities and to explore ways to stimulate collaboration; in short, to explore permissible and promising areas for collaboration for competing health plans. Competition has existed at the provider level in the pre-managed care era and continues among physicians, physician groups and hospitals today. What is new is the extent of competition at the managed care organization level in individual regional markets. As large numbers of individuals are enrolled in health plans, the potential for new forms of cooperation for improving quality of care becomes possible. Along with these new possibilities, however, come questions about whether they bring the potential for antitrust violation.

Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Labor and Human Resources. Subcommittee on Public Health and Safety
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Medical
Languages : en
Pages : 114

View

Book Description

Author: Paul Bate
Publisher: Radcliffe Publishing
ISBN: 1846191513
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 270

View

Book Description
This challenging and highly practical book draws on the findings from an international study designed to help practitioners and researchers understand the factors and processes that enable healthcare organisations in the United States and Europe to achieve - and sustain - high quality services for their users. The in-depth case-studies from seven leading hospitals give an international, evidence-based outlook that focuses on both the organisational and cultural processes of quality improvement. Implication for research and practice are considered, and a checklist of possible challenges has been drawn up to help identify any 'gaps' in initiatives. Healthcare policy makers and shapers including hospital chief executives and NHS directors will find this book enlightening, as will healthcare quality improvement and service development researchers and professionals. Clinicians with an interest in quality improvement will also find much of interest.